a map of interest
Oct. 16th, 2007 12:26 pmI think this map of the United States deserves a wider audience: http://www.flickr.com/photos/catandgirl/1585186867/
(Apart from the giant trainwreck in the northeast, and the whole Hawaii/Alaska question,
doctroid pointed out that they got Michigan wrong. Are there other obvious screw-ups?)
(Apart from the giant trainwreck in the northeast, and the whole Hawaii/Alaska question,
no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 04:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 04:43 pm (UTC)That's no lake,
Date: 2007-10-16 04:47 pm (UTC)Re: That's no lake,
Date: 2007-10-16 04:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 05:38 pm (UTC)At least this map is the first I've seen that gets Rhode Island right. Duh, it's an ISLAND, folks -- you can't have an island that's attached to the mainland on three sides, can you?
no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 05:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 06:18 pm (UTC)At least there were no sea monsters.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-16 10:52 pm (UTC)For whatever it's worth, Michigan is missing its Lake Erie shore, the Canadian western provinces are about half their usual height, and it's already been noted but I can't stop staring at Michigan's upper peninsula, which is apparently squeezed into a ribbon and annexed by Wisconsin. I'm impressed that the artist felt it was more important to get the Great Lakes' shapes and proportions more accurate than the states around them.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-17 03:58 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-10-17 12:20 pm (UTC)It still doesn't explain Wisconsin/Michigan.
no subject
Date: 2007-10-18 08:32 pm (UTC)