Conservapedia revisited

[jwgh]

Having seen the latest versions of the conservapedia pages for Homo sapiens [in the discussion for that page we see: 'Can we add the creationist view on "Homo Sapiens?"'/'Yes, but keep it neutral.'] and the page for dinosaurs , I am a little sad that conservapedia hasn't discovered trilobites yet. (They're benthic and vagile, you know.)

(I started clicking around Conservapedia again after stumbling across uncyclopedia's article on it.)

Comments

[majorzed.livejournal.com]

I'd like to see the section on "The origins of Man according to non-Abrahamic religions" filled out more. I bet a few of them would make more sense than the orthodox creationist view. Now, that would provide some perspective!