Fargo note
Nov. 6th, 2007 02:28 pmI've been going on a bit of a Coen brothers kick recently; in the past week or so I've watched 'Miller's Crossing', 'The Hudsucker Proxy', and 'Fargo'. (To round it off I should watch 'Blood Simple' again sometime soon; after that I'll have exhausted all of the Coen brothers movies I own.)
After I watched Fargo again I was thinking about how the movie is intentionally vague as to exactly what Jerry Lundegaard needs money for. I think that I've heard the Coens say in an interview that they always figured he was caught up in some kind of pyramid scheme, which makes sense, but I like to think that Jerry might have been the victim of a 419-type scam (variants of which existed as far back as the 1920s, apparently).
After I watched Fargo again I was thinking about how the movie is intentionally vague as to exactly what Jerry Lundegaard needs money for. I think that I've heard the Coens say in an interview that they always figured he was caught up in some kind of pyramid scheme, which makes sense, but I like to think that Jerry might have been the victim of a 419-type scam (variants of which existed as far back as the 1920s, apparently).
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 07:39 pm (UTC)"You ain't got a license to kill bookies and today I ain't sellin'. So take your flunky and dangle."
great quote.
also - some of their newer stuff isn't as bad as it looked originally, ie, intolerable cruelty.
i'm still on the fence about the newest movie, as i scare easily.
no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 07:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 07:23 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 07:45 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 07:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-06 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-11-07 03:29 am (UTC)