jwgh: (Default)
[personal profile] jwgh
http://homokaasu.org/gasgames/game.gas?21

Orbits seem to be the way to go on the early levels. Then again, it's not like I'm anywhere close to the high scores.

Is it computing orbits correctly?

Date: 2005-06-25 04:05 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vardissakheli.livejournal.com
Even in just two dimensions, it seems like it should be MUCH harder to crash into a harmonic attractor.

Re: Is it computing orbits correctly?

Date: 2005-06-25 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
It's not a harmonic attractor (which would be Hooke's law, force increasing linearly with distance); looks more like a simple attempt to do inverse-square gravity with Euler integration. It has typical step-size problems at short distances.

oops

Date: 2005-06-25 04:20 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] vardissakheli.livejournal.com
Been way too long for me to remember the correct names for physics concepts! I probably couldn't distinguish between Bremsstrahlung and Chrerenkov radation anymore either :-(

Re: oops

Date: 2005-06-25 05:24 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] mmcirvin.livejournal.com
Actually, the orbits precess so much that I suspect it might be inverse-linear gravity. (People trying to get inverse-square gravity right often do this by accident, because they forget or don't know that the unit vector in the direction of r, divided by r2, is the same as the vector r divided by r3.)

Profile

jwgh: (Default)
Jacob Haller

June 2024

S M T W T F S
      1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 8th, 2025 03:02 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios